|
Wayne, Flow control has been a pain in my side since the SBC (Z80) v1. Using the MAX232, this board made DTR/DSR available. The SBC-188 was patterned on this board. DTR/DSR is what my a/n terminal implements. But with the N8, RTS/CTS was supported by the Z180. Even the SBC v2 had jumpers (quite an array) to use either DTR/DSR or RTS/CTS. This means I use special wiring of the cable to my a/n terminal. Ugh! I can't switch the terminal between one protocol or the other. :'( That is why the MF/PIC board allows stuffing with either a MAX232 (easy to obtain & cheap) or a MAX235 (harder to find, more expensive). The MAX235 has 5 receivers and 5 transmitters, rather than 2 apiece in the MAX232. So we have: SBC v1 DTR/DSR SBC v2 RTS/CTS or DTR/DSR Zeta DTR/DSR N8 RTS/CTS SBC-188 DTR/DSR Mini-68K uses MF/PIC board MF/PIC DTR/DSR (MAX232 stuffing) RTS/CTS and/or DTR/DSR (MAX235 stuffing) I guess this is a problem that I just have to live with. However, I like very much the idea of using the flow control that is implemented in the UART chip hardware. I'll hang on to my funny conversion cable for a while. --John On 06/25/2012 09:55 PM, Wayne Warthen wrote: So, yet another follow-up on this UART flow control thing. I received a few NXP 16C560B UART chips today. These are DIP style UARTs that are fully 16C550 compatible. I was able to confirm that these do implement automatic hardware flow control (RTS/CTS) properly. So, the good news is that for anyone that cares about hardware flow control, this is an excellent choice -- it replaces your existing 16C550 without any trouble. |