[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
BAT43 vs. 1N5818
- To: n8vem@googlegroups.com
- Subject: BAT43 vs. 1N5818
- From: Paul Birkel <pbi...@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 04:50:26 -0400
- Authentication-results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of pbi...@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.174 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=pbi...@gmail.com; dkim=pass head...@gmail.com
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=fulVSNa+bL9EkTHaaT39Vjrjt5461DHrTM7w4Kt1k2I=; b=GQZ1Xrz/cGIAzySRZQMYcqJXpCHrwatPVPBPv4jielMmya4LKShsEeSXJmHBUq73v7 gh+9uZYN66mG6EcCPpUqfpriduuARxa6CSWx4aB7kIl/mI4227pDC0IXgMdcf8gMlXWH 3AbzlmCtzXdq/02BhxDH2xy1isvT/FnxdaX+yJ2+bvYFO2UhGALhCHXS81dbsSXZEmR3 EBlXlGqoYfmaSlQR4tsmHB/Xud1fBSVQR/GKoXSl4XswXGFvYaCa1HsR9/lX2OYfOp5g BLlRKl+c2e6ObfAa/qdSWZagEEI+DVu/KsuHVP/+lrBfztEGHzWYXphHWQXMbd+9y56E X5aQ==
Is it considered to be the case that a 1N5818 may be substituted for
BAT43 in various applications (intended to generally substitute for a
1N4148 signal diode; e.g., see D1-D5 in the current N8)?
While the BAT43 appears to be generally difficult to procure, the
1N5818 appears to be readily available, e.g.:
https://www.jameco.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/Product_10001_10001_177957_-1
10+ $0.14@ (order in multiples of 10)
Thanks,
paul