[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [N8VEM: 10537] Re: SD / SPI interface



So going on this info it would be safe to say that a CPLD in a PLCC package with a thru hole socket and JTAG programming (via a byteblaster or equivalent cable) would be the best option at present, at least the most hobby friendly.

now onto the trickier stuff, what other things would this be driving? how many channels would one want from an spi interface? how many chip selects? etc.

the main idea is to drive an SD card but i cannot see why it cannot be used for a vast majiority of SPI driven peripherals like LED displays/ alpha-numeric lcds/ keyboards/ I2C memories the list goes on

I shall chuck this idea in the viable bin and await everyones ideas / criticisms :)

Regards
Paul

On 15/07/2011 12:56 AM, al...@alanlee.org wrote:

 

I looked at the XC9500 but the Atmel was cheaper with more gate resources.  Though if you only need a PLCC-44 and 30 cells, they are comparable in price.

 

All the programming cables for Lattice, Xilinx, Atmel and Altera (and presumably Actel) are similar.  Just buffered parallel port lines with AC couple caps and series termination.  Though the DB-25 pin out varies.  I ordered PCBs to also build programming adapters for the JR-IDE boards, but the parts kit cost totaled $10 w/o PCB only to find fully assembled ByteBlaster II cables on eBay from Hong Kong for $16 shipped to the states.  doh.

 

-Alan

On July 14, 2011 at 12:21 PM Sergey <sk...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Yeah, that's what I was about to say. Xilinx XC9500 series are +5V /
> +3.3V, and available in PLCC packages, that can be installed in
> through hole sockets. I checked the production status recently, and
> they are still marked as "in production" and I don't see any end of
> life notice. Xilinx software is available for free, and programmer is
> really easy to build (one 74HC125 IC and few resistors and
> capacitors).
>
> Thanks,
> Sergey
>
> On Jul 14, 8:47 am, "a....@alanlee.org" <...@alanlee.org> wrote:
> >  
> > I've looked high an low for 5V through-hole PLD options.
> >  
> > I'm not sure of the production status of equivalent Lattice M4A5s and Xilinx
> > XC9500s.  Both are considered mature devices by the makers and neither have a
> > superseding line.  Both are still available in quantity from suppliers and have
> > excellent free tool support though prices do not scale as well as the Atmel
> > parts.  The availability of Atmel ATF150xs can be sketchy at times too as they
> > are not stocked in the same quantities as the bigger PLD companies.
> >  
> > NXP has a cheap 24 line FET level shifter for $.89 in qty 1.  I'm using a few of
> > those plus a 3.3V MachXO2 from Lattice in a few designs.  It works out pretty
> > well and is cost effective but puts the boards squarely in the world of SMT.
> >  The XO2 just can't be beat on features/price atm once the production qty scales
> > up in the next few month.  I'm using it for my 32MB XMS/EMS/Conventional ISA
> > RAM/ROM card.  An open design, but not hobby assembly friendly at all.
> >
> > On July 14, 2011 at 11:02 AM Shadow Lurker <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > The older 7000 series are getting on a bit now so id say the prices are going
> > > up quite a lot unfortunately, i only use them since i have about 50-100
> > > devices laying around that were written off from my work.
> >
> > > luckily most of the designing im doing of late is mostly , and i have moved
> > > into the fpga domain since im using in excess of 1500 logic cells.... but
> > > thats a whole nother story.
> >
> > > if theres any other chip selections out there that you or others know of id
> > > love to know and possibly give me some options for this idea.. (more
> > > affordable)
> >
> > > Regards
> > > Paul
> >
> > > On 14/07/2011 10:11 PM, a....@alanlee.org [mailto:a....@alanlee.org]  wrote:
> > > >  
> > > > NM, I looked at some of the prices on Digikey and oh em gee.   Unless there
> > > > is someone that sells them for about 20% of that price, the Atmel parts are
> > > > still preferred for price.  I'm using 2 in the design of the XT-IDE+ for
> > > > PCjr (JR-IDE) of which the first prototype batch of PCBs should be in next
> > > > week and 1 in a single chip redesign of XT-IDE which will go out for order
> > > > in 2 weeks.  And they can be programmed via an Altera ByteBlaster II
> > > > cable/header and free software. Perfect for hobbyists if only WinCUPL wasn't
> > > > so unstable.
> > > > -Alan
> > > >  
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "N8VEM" group.
> To post to this group, send email to n8...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to n8vem+un...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/n8vem?hl=en.
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "N8VEM" group.
To post to this group, send email to n8...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to n8vem+un...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/n8vem?hl=en.