[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [N8VEM: 3912] Re: [!! SPAM] [N8VEM: 3908] Use of bus termination cards?
- To: <n8...@googlegroups.com>
- Subject: RE: [N8VEM: 3912] Re: [!! SPAM] [N8VEM: 3908] Use of bus termination cards?
- From: "Andrew Lynch" <lyn...@yahoo.com>
- Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 19:21:17 -0400
- Authentication-results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of lyn...@yahoo.com designates 68.142.229.96 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=lyn...@yahoo.com; domainkeys=pass (test mode) header.From=lyn...@yahoo.com
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:From:To:References:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer:Thread-Index:In-Reply-To:X-MimeOLE; b=aij4k8jf0NtOCgiuo3DkokExYpgzJZMMwYefg2OfCkN3opV3t6x0GHx1PZIql9kL5Eq16ht/7ms9cBeXGprCNilrUpQIdpK9pnBIW/sHIjqyBjwr7IdSJ6Nougy1qwX7T9YVjglVis004ehwKh1esDQ8BPL677Clq72QiVyo/9M= ;
- Domainkey-status: good (test mode)
- In-reply-to: <4A428C8D.309@nj7p.org>
- References: <E1MJY4m-0000qJ-3I@palantir.moria.de> <4A428985.6040306@online.de> <4A428C8D.309@nj7p.org>
- Thread-index: Acn1Cm1c0qsUjU2iTROLWIt5gYgEhgCb7Nkg
Hi Bill! Speaking of S-100, the N8VEM S-100 backplane uses active
termination similar to the early Godbout variety. The schematic is
available in the S-100 directory on the wiki.
I suppose the circuit could be readily adapted to ECB. However, I think I
agree with Wolfgang on this one; for slow and small systems (4MHz and less
than 10 slots) termination is probably unnecessary. If anyone with a bus
analyzer could do some testing and verify as to how the ECB performs. I am
certainly interested in finding out myself!
Thanks and have a nice day!
Andrew Lynch
> -----Original Message-----
> From: n8...@googlegroups.com [mailto:n8...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of
> Bill Beech (NJ7P)
> Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2009 4:29 PM
> To: n8...@googlegroups.com
> Subject: [N8VEM: 3912] Re: [!! SPAM] [N8VEM: 3908] Use of bus termination
> cards?
>
>
> All,
>
> In the S-100 bus realm we used an active termination - I believe it was
> 470 ohm resistors to an approximately 2.0 volt stiff DC source.
> Termination only on one end of the board. This forces all boards to
> actively drive both ones and zeros but did match the impedance of the 20
> inch long S-100 bus lines. It really cleaned up the signals especially
> with the higher speed boards.
>
> Bill
>
> dr. wolfgang kabatzke wrote:
> > Michael Haardt schrieb:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I have seen a few bus termination cards, but now I start to wonder:
> >> Shouldn't they be used as a pair, one on each end of the backplane?
> >>
> >> One article I saw mentioned having to use bus termination for ECB bus
> >> speeds of 20 MHz. That's damned fast for ECB, so the termination card
> >> must do something, but again there is no sign of needing two cards.
> >>
> >> Michael
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> > Hi everybody,
> >
> > I found in my CD-Collection a description of my Siemens-SMP16-System.
> > Ok, I have this text only in German. But You may see on this sheet
> > that SMP16 has a bus-termination. On the left side are the signals on
> > the bus and on the right side is the text.
> >
> > V1 is pull-up on the PCB (CPU, Memory, etc.=
> > V2 is massive parts of copper on the PCB
> > V3 is a mssive copper inlay in the PCB
> > R1 is 3k3-Pull-up on the backplane to +5V (termination)
> > R2 is 4k7-Pull-up on the backplane to +5V
> > RC is R and C to GND
> >
> >
> >
> > Here you see the termination (in the middle of connector 1 and 2 on
> > the left side.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Best regards
> >
> > Wolfgang
> >
> > >
>
>
>