Home » RBC Forums » General Discussion » xmodem-1K, ymodem, or zmodem (improved data transfer programs for CP/M)
Re: xmodem-1K, ymodem, or zmodem [message #9035 is a reply to message #9032] |
Sun, 22 August 2021 07:08   |
 |
Wayne W
Messages: 385 Registered: October 2015 Location: Fallbrook, California, US...
|
Senior Member |
|
|
b1ackmai1er wrote on Sun, 22 August 2021 02:06The version of zmodem I have attached is https://github.com/mecparts/zmp which is re-implementation of zmp based on the last available code release of Ron Murray's zmp.
One of the changes in this reimplemetation is that it does not support multiple ports. i.e. it only supports console and one comm. port.
Ah, OK, that explains it. I saw the setport routine in the overlay, but no way to use it and it did not seem to be getting invoked. It was confusing.
b1ackmai1er wrote on Sun, 22 August 2021 02:06The driver still supports ability to switch ports (Two comm. ports - A & B) and can be used with the original zmp but both versions do require a separate comms. port for the transfer, separate to the console.
OK. It is odd that the functionality was dropped. I think it is important to have such functionality. However, I am worried about losing the latest updates in the code. I don't suppose the serial port switching could be crafted back into the lastest? Also, I think there is a bit more complication to this. The console is not guaranteed to be on HBIOS unit Char 0. ZMP should use the current console unit for the console (which I think it should automatically) and then allow using any other port for communications. This means comparing the requested port with the current console unit and disallowing the use of the console unit. I can do this if you like.[/quote]
This is great work. Thanks Phil.
-Wayne
|
|
|
 |
|
xmodem-1K, ymodem, or zmodem
By: lynchaj on Wed, 28 July 2021 07:23
|
 |
|
Re: xmodem-1K, ymodem, or zmodem
By: edzard on Wed, 28 July 2021 08:11
|
 |
|
Re: xmodem-1K, ymodem, or zmodem
By: scruss on Wed, 28 July 2021 11:56
|
 |
|
Re: xmodem-1K, ymodem, or zmodem
By: lynchaj on Thu, 29 July 2021 03:15
|
 |
|
Re: xmodem-1K, ymodem, or zmodem
|
 |
|
Re: xmodem-1K, ymodem, or zmodem
|
 |
|
Re: xmodem-1K, ymodem, or zmodem
By: lynchaj on Wed, 11 August 2021 08:20
|
 |
|
Re: xmodem-1K, ymodem, or zmodem
By: Wayne W on Wed, 11 August 2021 17:47
|
 |
|
Re: xmodem-1K, ymodem, or zmodem
|
 |
|
Re: xmodem-1K, ymodem, or zmodem
By: Wayne W on Thu, 12 August 2021 12:34
|
 |
|
Re: xmodem-1K, ymodem, or zmodem
|
 |
|
Re: xmodem, ymodem, zmodem
|
 |
|
Re: xmodem-1K, ymodem, or zmodem
By: Wayne W on Fri, 20 August 2021 19:47
|
 |
|
Re: xmodem-1K, ymodem, or zmodem
By: Wayne W on Sat, 21 August 2021 12:36
|
 |
|
Re: xmodem-1K, ymodem, or zmodem
|
 |
|
Re: xmodem-1K, ymodem, or zmodem
By: plasmo on Sat, 21 August 2021 19:04
|
 |
|
Re: xmodem-1K, ymodem, or zmodem
By: Wayne W on Sat, 21 August 2021 20:04
|
 |
|
Re: xmodem-1K, ymodem, or zmodem
|
 |
|
Re: xmodem-1K, ymodem, or zmodem
|
 |
|
Re: xmodem-1K, ymodem, or zmodem
By: Wayne W on Sun, 22 August 2021 07:09
|
 |
|
Re: xmodem-1K, ymodem, or zmodem
By: Wayne W on Sun, 22 August 2021 07:08
|
 |
|
Re: xmodem-1K, ymodem, or zmodem
By: Wayne W on Sun, 22 August 2021 07:13
|
 |
|
Re: xmodem-1K, ymodem, or zmodem
By: lynchaj on Sun, 22 August 2021 09:37
|
 |
|
Re: xmodem-1K, ymodem, or zmodem
By: plasmo on Sun, 22 August 2021 11:56
|
 |
|
Re: xmodem-1K, ymodem, or zmodem
By: agn453 on Sun, 22 August 2021 22:37
|
 |
|
Re: xmodem-1K, ymodem, or zmodem
By: lynchaj on Mon, 23 August 2021 06:23
|
 |
|
Re: xmodem-1K, ymodem, or zmodem
By: Wayne W on Mon, 23 August 2021 11:10
|
 |
|
Re: xmodem-1K, ymodem, or zmodem
By: lynchaj on Mon, 23 August 2021 11:32
|
 |
|
Re: xmodem-1K, ymodem, or zmodem
By: lynchaj on Tue, 12 October 2021 04:13
|
 |
|
Re: xmodem-1K, ymodem, or zmodem
By: Wayne W on Sun, 22 August 2021 07:01
|
 |
|
Re: xmodem-1K, ymodem, or zmodem
By: lynchaj on Tue, 12 October 2021 04:27
|
Current Time: Wed May 14 10:21:34 PDT 2025
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00672 seconds
|