Home » RBC Forums » General Discussion » xmodem-1K, ymodem, or zmodem (improved data transfer programs for CP/M)
Re: xmodem, ymodem, zmodem [message #9025 is a reply to message #9024] |
Fri, 20 August 2021 06:26   |
jayindallas
Messages: 110 Registered: June 2021
|
Senior Member |
|
|
These three names X/Y/Zmodem invoke memories of the CP/M+Modem experiences of the 80s.
This sequence equate into the cringe of getting a remote connection to a computer I fixed up for my parents, so I could transfer a file to their system. Their system had 8" drives, mine were 5.25" drives, so it was better if I could send the files to their computer before I arrived to install it.
With X-modem and a one-phoneline household at the remote end, I had to spend 30 minutes to an hour telling them the keyboard sequence they'd have to type once they hungup the phone and activated the modem for my call... plus all the trial and error of their keystrokes and the many attempts to start-over. It was so nearly impossible that I paid to put a second phoneline in their house for the modem, so I could live-chat them through the process. I liked X-Modem in general, but these particular transfers still haunt me. 
Y-modem was nice improvement. The walkthrough time seems like it dropped to 15 to 5 minutes. In comparison to X-Modem it seemed like the ultimate improvement... at the time.
Z-Modem was THE REAL great improvement, I just had to tell them to turn the modem on and I could handle most everything on my end of the call.
I don't remember much about the modem commands I had to talk them through, back in the day, my memory of them are all about the time it took to get my parents to enter the necessary commands on their side of the connection.
Glad that doesn't need to happen anymore.
[Updated on: Fri, 20 August 2021 06:44] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
 |
|
xmodem-1K, ymodem, or zmodem
By: lynchaj on Wed, 28 July 2021 07:23
|
 |
|
Re: xmodem-1K, ymodem, or zmodem
By: edzard on Wed, 28 July 2021 08:11
|
 |
|
Re: xmodem-1K, ymodem, or zmodem
By: scruss on Wed, 28 July 2021 11:56
|
 |
|
Re: xmodem-1K, ymodem, or zmodem
By: lynchaj on Thu, 29 July 2021 03:15
|
 |
|
Re: xmodem-1K, ymodem, or zmodem
|
 |
|
Re: xmodem-1K, ymodem, or zmodem
|
 |
|
Re: xmodem-1K, ymodem, or zmodem
By: lynchaj on Wed, 11 August 2021 08:20
|
 |
|
Re: xmodem-1K, ymodem, or zmodem
By: Wayne W on Wed, 11 August 2021 17:47
|
 |
|
Re: xmodem-1K, ymodem, or zmodem
|
 |
|
Re: xmodem-1K, ymodem, or zmodem
By: Wayne W on Thu, 12 August 2021 12:34
|
 |
|
Re: xmodem-1K, ymodem, or zmodem
|
 |
|
Re: xmodem, ymodem, zmodem
|
 |
|
Re: xmodem-1K, ymodem, or zmodem
By: Wayne W on Fri, 20 August 2021 19:47
|
 |
|
Re: xmodem-1K, ymodem, or zmodem
By: Wayne W on Sat, 21 August 2021 12:36
|
 |
|
Re: xmodem-1K, ymodem, or zmodem
|
 |
|
Re: xmodem-1K, ymodem, or zmodem
By: plasmo on Sat, 21 August 2021 19:04
|
 |
|
Re: xmodem-1K, ymodem, or zmodem
By: Wayne W on Sat, 21 August 2021 20:04
|
 |
|
Re: xmodem-1K, ymodem, or zmodem
|
 |
|
Re: xmodem-1K, ymodem, or zmodem
|
 |
|
Re: xmodem-1K, ymodem, or zmodem
By: Wayne W on Sun, 22 August 2021 07:09
|
 |
|
Re: xmodem-1K, ymodem, or zmodem
By: Wayne W on Sun, 22 August 2021 07:08
|
 |
|
Re: xmodem-1K, ymodem, or zmodem
By: Wayne W on Sun, 22 August 2021 07:13
|
 |
|
Re: xmodem-1K, ymodem, or zmodem
By: lynchaj on Sun, 22 August 2021 09:37
|
 |
|
Re: xmodem-1K, ymodem, or zmodem
By: plasmo on Sun, 22 August 2021 11:56
|
 |
|
Re: xmodem-1K, ymodem, or zmodem
By: agn453 on Sun, 22 August 2021 22:37
|
 |
|
Re: xmodem-1K, ymodem, or zmodem
By: lynchaj on Mon, 23 August 2021 06:23
|
 |
|
Re: xmodem-1K, ymodem, or zmodem
By: Wayne W on Mon, 23 August 2021 11:10
|
 |
|
Re: xmodem-1K, ymodem, or zmodem
By: lynchaj on Mon, 23 August 2021 11:32
|
 |
|
Re: xmodem-1K, ymodem, or zmodem
By: lynchaj on Tue, 12 October 2021 04:13
|
 |
|
Re: xmodem-1K, ymodem, or zmodem
By: Wayne W on Sun, 22 August 2021 07:01
|
 |
|
Re: xmodem-1K, ymodem, or zmodem
By: lynchaj on Tue, 12 October 2021 04:27
|
Current Time: Wed May 14 11:15:35 PDT 2025
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00748 seconds
|